|
0800 195 2373 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Piracy in the workplace
IT asset management - the bigger picture Those of us who have been in the industry for a while will remember the problems that resulted from a 1st person-shooter game called 'Doom': early bandwidth-heavy incarnations of this game, coupled with its huge popularity at work, caused networks to choke resulting in a double whammy for businesses: lost productivity due to employees playing the game and lost productivity due to other employees experiencing poor network performance. Nowadays, with high speed networks, performance degradation is not the issue it was back then; the scope and implications of an employee's misuse of assets, however, can be far greater. As many news reports indicate, all too often some employees abuse the broadband access and processor power your organisation has invested in to download audio and movie files and, often, share with other users - inside and outside of the company. Assessing the risk The word ‘potentially’ is important here because the advice from top UK media lawyers at Pinsent Masons is that, in practice, so long as a company has reasonable web guidelines that employees are made aware of, the individual employee, rather than the company, will normally be held solely accountable. Following last year’s change to the Copyright, Design and Patents Act of 1988, the Federation Against Software Theft is also warning directors at companies which do not have employee guidelines for responsible web use that they could face unlimited fines and risk prison alongside offending employees. However, simply proving that employee guidelines exist does not detract from the severe embarrassment and damage to brand perception that can accompany an investigation. This was certainly the case when Honeywell was very publicly investigated by the UK music industry body, BPI, for a few staff members having vast libraries of illegal music files in 2002. A similar misdemeanour in a US company earned it a $1m fine. More bandwidth = bigger problem What might seem even more worrying is that although these figures are huge, researchers believe the attention of file sharers has shifted from audio to films. A study published by online video delivery company, CacheLogic, two years ago reported that illegal MP3s only accounted for one in ten illegal downloads and that two in three are now movies – the rest is a mixture of software and games. The problem stems from the simple fact that internet connections have got faster and so the corporate networks and the computers connected to them can now download far bigger files than possible just a short handful of years ago. This has added to the appeal of file sharing P2P (peer to peer) networks, such as BitTorrent and Kazaa, which allow people all around the world to swap pirated films, audio, software and games. The motivation is not only free downloads but also the content can get around geographical restrictions, allowing people to view movies and television shows before they are released in their region. New UK legislation? Whether by self-regulation or by Government intervention, new anti-piracy measures will intensify pressure on companies to tackle the problem at source. Just as a company needs to establish it has the latest versions of essential software with sufficient licences, it should use asset management tools to detect illegal downloading activity and unlicensed/banned applications and take steps to prevent them. How IT asset management can help Your next step after policy-making could be enforcing it: using an asset management tool such as Numara Track-It! to automatically audit your networked PCs and Macs and identify those machines running any suspect or banned applications. Additional tools such as Numara Deploy could then be used to forcibly delete those applications from specific machines if necessary. If you want to get down to the data file names and types, a solution such as Numara Asset Manager will identify potentially unwanted files by searching for file extensions and file names. An employee with a large library or MP3 (audio) files or MP4 (video) files for example might warrant closer investigation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|